Performance Schema

IMG_6610Most DBAs wanted something like performance schema  back in 4.0. Percona started to add statistics to information_schema by 5.#s.  I never turned them on. I’m not sure if it was due to being too busy, not knowing what the performance hit would be or just not knowing about them. I admit it. I didn’t turn them on. But when I went to Mark Leith’s talks at the Percona Conference in Santa Clara I wanted to use those new statistics. But clearly I was going to have to upgrade to mysql 5.6 to get the full monty.

First thing I did when I upgraded to 5.6 (percona server) was to turn on performance_schema (P_S) full tilt, even though I’d been warned there would be a performance hit. But hey, I was turning it full on, on these big beasts. I hadn’t even dreamed of servers this big but here I was. I thought the application would only use about 40% so what was 5% more? WRONG! First of all, having never used servers of this size I didn’t know I needed to tune them and neither did my SysAdmin. They were NEVER tuned. After they went into production I had to turn off performance_schema from collecting anything because I needed that 10%+. I also had to do some other crazy stuff I do NOT recommend as it isn’t replication safe. No one seemed to care but me.

However, I did turn P_S full on on the testing server. I wanted to see if it would help me slay some easy low hanging fruit sort of problems. The first thing I found was that to really use it in a meaningful way I needed to install views and triggers that make up the sys schema. I hate views and triggers as they make upgrading more challenging and they can slow down the server. I wondered if this was where the majority of the performance hit came from ? HA! That was an additional hit to the 10% I was experiencing. I only installed the sys package by Mark Leith when I wanted to use it. They’re very helpful if you’re following one of Mark’s slideshows or blog posts about sys schema. They’re also fairly easy to install and uninstall.

I ran some queries that I got from those blog posts but interestingly nothing was really new. I’d already looked at the DDL of the largest tables, I’d seen the queries and I knew what was wrong. And like my experience told me, fixing the DDL and queries would boost the performance. I put P_S away while I was busting my butt on other problems.  But I longed for something like innotop so I could just glance at it throughout the day. Ah ha! I was not the only one. ps_top to the rescue.

I stumbled on a blog post by someone else who needed/wanted a ps_top program. I’m self taught so I learned UNIX by man pages (back when they seemed better written). I’ve compiled some gnarly programs as we didn’t have things like apt-get or yum. So what if I never compiled a GO app before? I can read documentation. But as an early adopter it means the documentation isn’t written for people like me (those that have never experienced GO before). Luckily I worked with the creator who worked on the documentation and I got ps-top to compile and run. Suddenly P_S was coming in handy with each new release. I could see the IO spike suddenly on a new table. Or the IO wait time. It was really handy for a new app that was being created.

I can’t wait to use mysql 5.7 and see how P_S has changed (rumor has it there is less of a performance hit and even MORE status). But in the meantime here are some cool URLs I’ve collected and want to be able to go back to (in no particular order).







Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s